<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel>
    <title>Comments on Dr. Bahnsen Debates Atheist Lawyer at University of California, Davis</title>
    <link>http://bhpca.mypublicsquare.com/view/dr-bahnsen-debates</link>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <description></description>
    <item>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The summarization listed in this article was first printed in Penpoint Vol 1, January 1994 and posted as a free article on &lt;a href="http://www.cmfnow.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;www.cmfnow.com&lt;/a&gt;. I would encourage students of apologetics to remember that the primary reason for giving a defense of our faith is not simply to cast down arguments, but to provide a means for evangelism. As Dr. Bahnsen has stated in another article &amp;#8220;The very reason why Christians are put in the position of giving a reasoned account of the hope that is in them is that not all men have faith. Because there is a world to be evangelized (men who are unconverted), there is the need for the believer to defend his faith: Evangelism naturally brings one into apologetics. This indicates that apologetics is no mere matter of &amp;#8220;intellectual jousting&amp;#8221;; it is a serious matter of life and death &amp;#8211; eternal life and death&amp;#8221;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <link>http://bhpca.mypublicsquare.com/view/dr-bahnsen-debates#content_9394</link>
      <guid>http://bhpca.mypublicsquare.com/view/dr-bahnsen-debates#content_9394</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 17:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Todd Cobb</author>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
